<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ontological Warfare - Latest Comments</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ontologicalwarfare.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:12:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Quantum Brain Hypothesis is Bunk</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.com/electric_amoeba_rave/quantumbrain.html#comment-5567045434</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your point is well taken that quantum processes don't provide a plausible explanation for brain functions, including consciousness. But neither do electrical signals explain consciousness. The fact that "controlling electrical signals artificially seems to influence animal behavior in a predictable fashion" doesn't support the claim that these signals &lt;i&gt;explain&lt;/i&gt; anything, and certainly not consciousness, which we have not manipulated in animals. Electric signals and radio waves can be used to influence the sound coming out of a radio, yet this doesn't help us explain how the symphony on my local classical radio station was composed or performed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lars</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quantum Brain Hypothesis is Bunk</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.com/electric_amoeba_rave/quantumbrain.html#comment-1958460530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beautifully said.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jory</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 22:58:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Measure of Mind</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.com/data_sequence/the_measure_of_mind.html#comment-1607029228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but the math in your article doesn't seem to display effectively, I only see tex source equations.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dk190</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Would Survey the Library of Babel?</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.com/dreams_of_borges/library_of_babel.html#comment-966767464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I loved that story. Nice analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rainwala</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 06:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://ontologicalwarfare.com/blog/quantumbrain.html</title><link>http://ontologicalwarfare.com/blog/quantumbrain.html#comment-396094280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;test&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anselm Levskaya</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Would Survey the Library of Babel?</title><link>http://www.ontologicalwarfare.com/who-would-survey-the-library-of-babel/#comment-47378570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Mike: &lt;br&gt;It is of course infinite if one allows for arbitrarily large books and shelves.  But that is less the point than the sheer size of the potentiality manifold of a simple book, which contains quite a modest amount of static information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anselm</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:00:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Measure of a Mind</title><link>http://www.ontologicalwarfare.com/the-measure-of-a-mind/#comment-47378571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;crazy ... i just gave a series of talks to middle schoolers and high schoolers on "brains, information and mathematics". we counted # of neurons and # synaptic connections etc. and used information theory (although in a different way ... looking at information in spikes instead...).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;see: &lt;a href="http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~watson/neuromath/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~watson/neuromath/"&gt;http://www.math.ucdavis.edu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:46:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Would Survey the Library of Babel?</title><link>http://www.ontologicalwarfare.com/who-would-survey-the-library-of-babel/#comment-47378569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;... So the size of the meta universe is infinite because we can always add more shelves to the galleries, and devise alphabets with more than 25 letters, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Kayton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>